17 September 2008

David Foster Wallace

Contemporary American writer and recipient of the 1997 MacArthur Foundation's grant (affectionately dubbed the"Genius Grant"), David Foster Wallace was found dead in his home on Friday. There isn't much that I can say here that hasn't already been said elsewhere, but I do feel a remarkable sadness that such an interesting creative giant has taken what I can only imagine would have been his best works yet with him. It's always a sad day when the creative among us passes.

Wallace gave the world his popular collections of short stories such as, "Girl With Curious Hair" and "Brief Interviews With Hideous Men." But probably more notably, he gifted the contemporary literary stage with Infinite Jest. I started reading Infinite Jest at the beginning of the summer, and, admittedly, have yet to finish. Even without reaching the hallowed last page, it comes as a profound sadness to know that there will be no more dark wit, cynicism, and off-beat humor. Thus far, I am enjoying Infinite Jest immensely, and I recommend making an effort to pour through it at some point.

But if you don't have time to sit through his lengthy novel just yet, at least take a glimpse of the Commencement speech Wallace gave on May 25, 2005 at Kenyon. It's far from a traditional speech, but it holds some incredibly laid-bare, point blank insights that, while on the surface might sound disheartening, actually gift the graduates with incredible freedom and control of their lives. An excerpt:

As I'm sure you guys know by now, it is extremely difficult to stay alert and attentive, instead of getting hypnotized by the constant monologue inside your own head (may be happening right now). Twenty years after my own graduation, I have come gradually to understand that the liberal arts cliché about teaching you how to think is actually shorthand for a much deeper, more serious idea: learning how to think really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience. Because if you cannot exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed. Think of the old cliché about quote the mind being an excellent servant but a terrible master.

This, like many clichés, so lame and unexciting on the surface, actually expresses a great and terrible truth. It is not the least bit coincidental that adults who commit suicide with firearms almost always shoot themselves in: the head. They shoot the terrible master. And the truth is that most of these suicides are actually dead long before they pull the trigger.



His reference to suicide in this profound speech three years ago raises questions about his own personal existence and dealing with his own "Terrible Master." Many references to the old adage of the "thin line between genius and insanity" have been raised since Wallace's death, but I don't believe it can be summed up in such a cavalier way. It ignores the difficulties that creative, highly intelligent individuals experience daily. It ignores the nuts and bolts of every day living. Benjamin Strong from the Village Voice says it best:

The short answer is easy. Wallace's father told the New York Times that his son had been taking anti-depression medications for 20 years and, feeling their cumulative side effects, had tried in the summer of 2007 to wean himself off of them, only to land in shock therapy and hospital stays after his illness returned. The longer, more complicated answer—namely, what it was exactly that was going through the writer's head when he hanged himself in his own home, where he had to know it would be his wife of four years who would find him—let's face it, that explanation is not ever going to be forthcoming.


Unfortunately, we'll never know the actual reason David Foster Wallace chose to take his own life, but I submit that we don't necessarily need to. The over-intellectualizing of his actions is precisely the kind of thinking and day-to-day behavior he railed against in his commencement speech. Sometimes we should just take things for face value and see the Water for the Water.

Do yourselves a favor and pick up one of his books. At the very least skip on over to Harper's, where they so graciously posted every piece they have ever printed by him in PDF format.

21 March 2008

Book Review: Comeback Season by Cathy Day


Any time a woman writes a book about dating and relationships the market assumes it will be a trendy “how to” manual, a fluffy Chick Lit novel, or, worse yet, an insincere combination of the two genres. Most serious scholars wouldn’t look twice at books in this category. For many serious critics and readers, the thought of a book about football and the agony of traversing the dating world couldn’t possibly hold any literary value. For this reason, Cathy Day’s memoir Comeback Season: How I Learned to Play the Game of Love, is not only unable to be easily categorized, it shakes up notions of where and how about social theory and commentary can take place.

Comeback Season chronicles Cathy Day’s experience jumping back into the dating game over the course of the 2006 Indianapolis Colts season. A lover of both football and “locker room speeches,” Day uses the tenacity of Peyton Manning and the Colts as an inspiration to make a genuine effort to overcome dating obstacles in her career, a new city renowned for dating difficulty for professional women, and her own patterns of unsuccessful partner choices. She bravely reveals her foray into the online dating world, and single-handedly fights a predatory scam dating service. At times Day’s emotional admissions are all too painfully familiar to many professional women, but she manages to keep things in perspective with a sharp wit and outright laugh-out-loud humor. Day employs an imaginary female sports reporter to inject both self deprecating humor and social commentary, and it quickly becomes clear that the reporter embodies the traditional expectations that Day has to fight against throughout her dating season.

More importantly, Comeback Season is a commentary about the unexpected results of the feminist movement. It is now far more common for women to put off getting married out of high school or an undergrad program in order to pursue a career and education. This is, unquestionably, a success for the feminist movement, but it doesn’t take into consideration the disparity between developing personal relationships and professional success that so many of those independent women, such as Day, face. When young girls were told that they can be whatever they wanted, all too often their attentions turned to career aspirations woefully devoid of female role models. Logically, then, those same young girls looked to male heroes to pattern their career paths after. Decades later it is no wonder that daughters of the early feminist movement are the ones left with the task of figuring out how to navigate between domestic desires and professional aspirations without crumbling under pressure to abandon one or the other. Couple this with the high personal and professional expectations of university English departments, and Day captures the complex lives of many female academics today.






From Comeback Season: How I Learned to Play the Game of Love:



…The ivory tower is full of single professional women, but in my experience, they very rarely talk about the similarity of their situations.

I was feeling mighty down the day of the exit interview. When Hattie asked me why I was leaving the college, I paused for a second and said, “Deep, soul-crushing loneliness.”

For a second, I thought we both might start crying. Hattie looked deflated, like I’d knocked the wind out of her with those words. “I know what you mean,” she offered. But then she recovered herself. She stood up from her chair, smoothed her blue skirt, and gave me a firm, businesslike handshake. “Good luck, Cathy.” (109)




To dismiss Comeback Season as merely a dating memoir is a mistake. Too often “serious” social commentaries are expected to be dry, boring, emotionless, and full of jargon. Because Day writes with an accessible, often humorous, style and does so without masking the core issues of her journey behind opaque symbolism, the questions her experience raises will reach more women, and generate more constructive discussion about road blocks women face, but are ashamed to discuss for fear of being perceived as weak. After all, the problems that intelligent, professional women face aren’t trapped inside the ivory tower. Cathy Day brings those issues to the streets in a way anyone can understand.


Review by Dawn Papuga




12 March 2008

Vote STBD! All the cool kids are doing it...

For those of you in Pittsburgh, I’m hoping your sense of Pittsburgh Pride will kick in here. For those of you not in the Burgh, let’s just say it’s a favor for me, hmm?

STBD, one of the longest web series online and based, filmed, performed, and produced right here in Pittsburgh, has been selected as one of 5 nominees by Yahoo for “Best Series” in their 2008 Yahoo Video Awards!” This could be big, since it’s a chance to bring a lot of world-wide attention to a Pittsburgh-based creation!

STBD is one of five nominees, so please go take two or three seconds to place your VOTE! (pretty please? )

Why should you vote for STBD?

  • Because I said “pretty please?”
  • The show is created, shot, and produced right here in Pittsburgh!
  • These folks are passionate about their product, and it provides endless laughs to otherwise boring days.
  • Mathis wasn’t elected for Mayor, so we’ve got to help him win something!
  • It’s about time the creative content that comes out of Pittsburgh is recognized globally!

Write well,

~Dawn

Check out the show at Something to be Desired and here on myspace at http://www.myspace.com/stbd